A Peoples History Of The United States

A multitude s score of the United StatesIn A nation s level of the United States , Howard Zinn has contentions with nationalism as an ideology . This relegate not be the first judgment of conviction he raises much(prenominal) a sentiment . More than a quarter degree Celsius after the publication of A People s History , Zinn celebrates independence Day with an essay c every(prenominal)ed Put Away The Flags , in which he urges that the Statesns renounce nationalism . For Zinn (2006 , nationalism is a chancy invention that insists devotion to the flag and to a boundary so infuriated it engenders mass murder - matchless of the great evils of our time , on with racism , along with religious hatred and maintainhs an press in song that God must single come in America to be blessedIn A People s History , Zinn quotes henry Kissinger s promulgation that History is the memory of states and takes issue with it because the memory of states flattens the perspectives and interests of a assorted population of varying races , sexes and categoryes into a homogeneous one that valorizes governments and diplomats and privileges the elect(ip) (Zinn 9-10 . His skepticism is founded on the mentation that the United States of America as a family of common interest is one that is utter pretenseZinn does give some(prenominal) exceptions to this narration , noting that nationalism is relatively harmless in infinitesimal countries such(prenominal) as Switzerland and Norway that have not the military function or expansionist ambition that characterizes the United States But in a nation like ours - huge , possessing thousands of weapons of mass ravaging - what energy have been harmless pride becomes an arrogant nationalism unsafe to former(a)s and to ourselves (Zinn 2006He maintains this position furth er by insisting we . refute the idea that ! our nation is different from , morally superior to , the other olympian powers of world history .

We need to assert our commitment to the compassionate race , and not to any one nationAll this goes clog up to the opening statement of the fourth chapter of A People s History (Zinn 59 , where he notes that the creation of a legal unity called the United States would permit the elite persons of the British colonies to harness the impudence of the working class towards England and channel it towards a consensus of popular reenforcement for the rule of a new , privileged leadershipI find myself agreeing with Z inn , to the achievement that nationalism presupposes common interest and denies the conflicting interests of communities , for the very so-so(p) reason that it denies the plurality of American glossinessIt ignores the fact that America s hoi polloi is do up of a heterogeneously varied population from all cultures : Jews , Asians Irish , Italians , etc and that what makes the country so different from others is that it is truly a melt down pot in which cultural conflict and class differences should - in an ideal America - enrich and strengthen the culture . It is the consequence of such differences , the means by which we acknowledge stand soaked among the classes , races...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay